The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2279•Mark J. Matney v. Volusia County Sheriff’s Department
02-2279Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2279
MARK J. MATNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; STATE OF
FLORIDA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
(CA-02-178-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark J. Matney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark J. Matney appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Matney v.
Volusia County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-02-178-1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.