Thomas M. Pressley v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2276
THOMAS M. PRESSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-3965-6-24-BG)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas M. Pressley, Appellant Pro Se. Justin Marshall Grow,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Pressley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment in favor of his former employer, the South
Carolina Department of Corrections, on his claims arising under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002), and the Family
Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Pressley v. South Carolina
Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-00-3965-6-24-BG (D.S.C. Sept. 30,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --