The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2258•Benjamin A. Johnson v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack
02-2258Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2258
BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK; UNUM LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-381-2)
Submitted: May 23, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr.,
Kimberly W. Daniel, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia;
Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action on res judicata and statute of
limitations grounds. We have independently reviewed the record and
find no error in the district court’s dismissal. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson
v. Pep Boys, No. CA-02-381-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.