The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2249•Northfield Insurance Company v. Evian Horizontal Property Regime
02-2249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 14, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2249
NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EVIAN HORIZONTAL PROPERTY REGIME; IMC RESORT
SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
EVIAN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED;
DONALD JAY PIER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleson. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-01-883-9-23)
Submitted: May 7, 2003 Decided: July 14, 2003
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Edward E. Bullard, LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD E. BULLARD, Hilton Head,
South Carolina, for Appellants. William C. Helms, III, Wendy J.
Keefer, G. Troy Thames, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS,
L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders entering
declaratory judgment for the insurer and denying the insureds’
motion for reconsideration. We previously granted Appellants’
unopposed motion to proceed without oral argument. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Northfield Ins.
Co. v. Evian Horizontal Prop. Regime, No. CA-01-883-9-23 (D.S.C.
Aug. 28 & Sept. 23, 2002).
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.