The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2234•Nancy C. Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
02-2234Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2234
NANCY C. MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-215-02)
Submitted: February 26, 2003 Decided: May 6, 2003
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy C. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Wagner Schwartz, TROUTMAN
SANDERS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nancy C. Martin appeals the district court’s order denying her
civil action alleging a claim under the Employment Retirement
Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Martin v. Metropolitan Life Ins., Co., No.
CA-02-215-02 (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.