The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2203•Loria Ann Patterson v. the American Kennel Club, a/k/a American Kennel Club, Incorporated
02-2203Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2203
LORIA ANN PATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB, a/k/a American
Kennel Club, Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-20-5-BR)
Submitted: December 18, 2002 Decided: January 10, 2003
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Loria Ann Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Matthew Keen, Sheri
Lea Roberson, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Loria Ann Patterson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendant’s motion for sanctions and dismiss her claims under the
Equal Pay Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Patterson v. Am. Kennel Club, No. CA-01-20-5-BR (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.