The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2180•Keith Andrew Green, Sr v. Karen Mee
02-2180Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2180
KEITH ANDREW GREEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KAREN MEE; C. EDMONDS; C. R. MORRISON,
Esquire; DONNA WATTS-LAMONT, Associate Member;
HAZEL A. WARNICK, Chairperson; MICHAEL TAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
2719-MJG)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Andrew Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Andrew Green appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his civil action against officials
from the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and
the attorney for his former employer, Colonial Parking. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Mee,
No. CA-02-2719-MJG (D. Md. filed Sept. 30, 2002; entered Oct. 1,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.