The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2025•Darryl Allmond v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The
02-2025Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2025
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES DUNNING; ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; DEPUTY COZZA;
DEPUTY WINSTEAD; DEPUTY MASON; SERGEANT ELLER;
RICHARD R. RUSCAK; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1106-A)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Elaine Kearney,
SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia; George Arthur
McAndrews, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Allmond seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Allmond seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.