The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1931•Georgia Anne McCauley v. JOHN OR JANE DOE, Dispatcher/Deputy
02-1931Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1931
GEORGIA ANNE MCCAULEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN OR JANE DOE, Dispatcher/Deputy; GARY
DEMBO, Deputy; A. R. CAHO, Sergeant; WILLIAM
JOHNSON, Sergeant; JAMES W. HAGY, Sheriff;
FREDERICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-02-684-L)
Submitted: February 25, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Georgia Anne McCauley, Appellant Pro Se. J. Marks Moore, III,
Samuel Maddox Riley, WEST & MOORE, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Georgia Anne McCauley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See McCauley v. Doe, No. CA-02-684-L (D. Md. July
12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.