The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1925•Lloyd Junior Maxwell v. United States Department of Justice
02-1925Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1925
LLOYD JUNIOR MAXWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; U.S.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; INS
DISTRICT DIRECTOR; LESLIE S. TURNER, A. D. C.;
LINDA DOMINQUEZ, A. D. C.; JILL H. DUFRESNE,
Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1675-S)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Junior Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Junior Maxwell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims
Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Maxwell v. United States Dep’t
of Justice, No. CA-02-1675-S (D. Md. June 26, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.