The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1923•William K. Avery v. Superior Bank, Fsb
02-1923Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1923
WILLIAM K. AVERY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SUPERIOR BANK, FSB,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-3785-AW)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William K. Avery, Appellant Pro Se. Alison E. Goldenberg, GORDON,
FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, Baltimore, Maryland;
Ava Elaine Lias-Booker, David Eugene Ralph, SAUL EWING, L.L.P.,
Baltimore, Maryland; Hugo A. Zia, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William K. Avery filed a complaint alleging race
discrimination in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15
U.S.C. § 1691 (2000), and related state law claims. The case was
tried before a jury and the district court entered judgment as a
matter of law in favor of the Defendant as to all counts. Avery
appeals. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
statements from the bench. The court properly found that Avery
failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that,
in any event, the Defendant presented legitimate, nondiscriminatory
reasons for the denial of credit. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.