Fannie M. Harris v. Wabash Magnetics, Incorporated

02-1916Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 13, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1916
FANNIE M. HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WABASH MAGNETICS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.
(CA-01-22-4)
Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fannie M. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. William David Paxton, M. Beth
Colling, GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MOORE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Fannie M. Harris appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Wabash
Magnetics, Inc., No. CA-01-22-4 (W.D. Va. July 19, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.