The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1915•Gabriel A. Boney v. Rmp National/holman Enterprise, Incorporated
02-1915Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1915
GABRIEL A. BONEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RMP NATIONAL/HOLMAN ENTERPRISE, INCORPORATED;
RODGER CLYDE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CARDELL THURMAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-1334-PJM)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Gabriel A. Boney, Appellant Pro Se. Gregg Stanton Avitabile,
VERNER, LIIPFERT, BERNHARD, MCPHERSON & HAND, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gabriel A. Boney appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Boney v. RMP Nat’l/Holman Enter., Inc.,
No. CA-02-1334-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.