The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1882•Lynard G. Williams v. Ppg Industries, Incorporated
02-1882Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1882
LYNARD G. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PPG INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-459)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lynard G. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Karin Marie McGinnis, Nicole
Lee Gardner, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Lynard G. Williams appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to his employer and dismissing his
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. *
See Williams v. PPG Indus., Inc., No. CA-01-459 (M.D.N.C. July 17,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.