The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1878•Rasun Heru Anpu Aton v. the Wackenhut Corporation
02-1878Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 17, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1878
RASUN HERU ANPU ATON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
01-598-S)
Submitted: March 25, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Steele, LAW OFFICE OF ERIC STEELE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Jeffrey P. Ayres, Thomas H. Strong, VENABLE, BAETJER &
HOWARD, L.L.P., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rasun Heru Anpu Aton appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Wackenhut in his employment
discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Aton v. Wackenhut Corp., No. CA-01-598-S
(D. Md. July 9, 2002; filed July 10, 2002, entered July 11, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.