The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Alan O’donnell v. COLIN POWELL, General, Secretary of State, U.S. State Department
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1834
ALAN O’DONNELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLIN POWELL, General, Secretary of State,
U.S. State Department, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-02-143-1-T)
Submitted: August 26, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan O’Donnell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alan O’Donnell appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his action against the Secretary of State. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. O’Donnell v. Powell, No. CA-02-143-1-T (W.D.N.C. filed July
2, 2002 & entered July 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.