The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1797•William Lee Richardson, Jr v. Richardson, 2002 WL 31545989 4th Cir. Nov. 18, 2002 , sanctioning Richardson $500…
02-1797Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 3, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1797
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID SANDERS, Honorable; CHRIS C. WILKES,
Honorable,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-36-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2002 Decided: January 3, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Easterling
Piziak, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* We note that this appeal was filed prior to the entry of the
this court’s opinion in Richardson v. Richardson, 2002 WL 31545989
(4th Cir. Nov. 18, 2002), sanctioning Richardson $500 for filing
frivolous appeals and enjoining him from filing further actions in
this court until the sanctions are paid and a district court judge
finds that the action is not frivolous.
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Richardson’s civil
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*
See Richardson v. Sanders, No. CA-02-36-1 (N.D.W. Va. July 8,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.