The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1788•Edward E. Stroupe, Jr v. Tandy Corporation
02-1788Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1788
EDWARD E. STROUPE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TANDY CORPORATION; RADIO SHACK; TRANSPORTATION
INSURANCE COMPANY; RSKCO, formerly known as
CNA Insurance; RAMESH MURTHY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virignia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-81-1)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Everett Kuehn,
LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia; William W. Eskridge,
PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stroupe v.
Radio Shack, No. CA-02-81-1 (W.D. Va. July 3, 2002). We deny
Stroupe’s “Motion for Waiver.” We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.