The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1723•Earl Brown v. Sears Automotive Center
02-1723Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1723
EARL BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SEARS AUTOMOTIVE CENTER; SEARS ROEBUCK AND
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-67)
Submitted: November 18, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Doughty Cole, Sr., Robert S.
O’Neale, III, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action alleging wrongful termination from employment. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Brown v. Sears Automotive Center, No. CA-01-67
(M.D.N.C. June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.