The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1675•Charles A. Gulden v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, United States Department of the Army
02-1675Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1675
CHARLES A. GULDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS E. WHITE, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-01-1519)
Submitted: September 9, 2002 Decided: September 24, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Gulden, Appellant Pro Se. Francis Patrick King, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Gulden appeals the district court’s order granting
the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Gulden v. White, No. CA-01-1519 (E.D. Va. May 7, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.