Darryl Allmond v. Alexandria Sherriff’s Department

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1665
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALEXANDRIA SHERRIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J.
PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS,
Sergeant; GEORGE GRAY, Deputy; DARREN HINZMAN,
Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-1666
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J.
PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS,
Sargeant; GEORGE GRAY, Deputy; DARREN HINZMAN,
Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 02-1827
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J.
PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS,
Sargeant; GEORGE A. GRAY, Deputy; DARREN
HINZMAN, Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-309-A)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Elaine Kearney,
SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Allmond v. Alexandria Sherriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-02-309-A
(E.D. Va. filed June 4, 2002 & entered June 10, 2002; June 7 & July
11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --