The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1658•Reginald D. Evans v. LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the United States Army
02-1658Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1658
REGINALD D. EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the United States
Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge.
(CV-99-865-17-BC)
Submitted: September 16, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald E. Evans appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed
the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
magistrate judge. See Evans v. Caldera, No. CV-99-865-17-BC (D.S.C.
filed May 29, 2002, entered May 31, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.