The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1633•Theron J. Bartell v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
02-1633Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1633
THERON J. BARTELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-00-453)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theron J. Bartell, Appellant Pro Se. James C. Allison, Susan
Elizabeth Murphy, Louis Lopez, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Theron J. Bartell appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his action
against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Bartell v. EEOC, No. CA-00-453 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.