The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1626•United States of America v. Jose Antonio Lozano
02-1626Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 13, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1626
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
PROPERTY, 3714 CANCUN LOOP, WEBB COUNTY,
LAREDO, TEXAS, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND
IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
Defendant,
HILL TOP FARM, LIMITED, a Texas Limited
Partnership,
Claimant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-98-11-1)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 13, 2002
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Antonio Lozano, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jose Antonio Lozano appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Government in this forfeiture
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Lozano, No. CA-98-11-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.