The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1625•Rodney Michael Bailey v. Mid Atlantic Isotopes/geodax
02-1625Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1625
RODNEY MICHAEL BAILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MID ATLANTIC ISOTOPES/GEODAX,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
01-3795-JFM)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Michael Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Milton
Pilachowski, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Michael Bailey appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Mid Atlantic Isotopes/GEODAX
and dismissing Bailey’s employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Bailey v. Mid Atlantic Isotopes/GEODAX, No. CA-01-
3795-JFM (D. Md. filed May 1, 2002; entered May 2, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.