The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1562•Pamela J. Diltz v. United States of America
02-1562Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1562
PAMELA J. DILTZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-02-7-1-T)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela J. Diltz, Appellant Pro Se. David I. Pincus, Annette Marie
Wietecha, Dara B. Oliphant, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Pamela J. Diltz appeals the district court’s orders granting
the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons and denying
Diltz’s motions for clarification and injunctive relief. Our
review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Diltz v. United States, No. CA-02-7-1-T (W.D.N.C.
May 1 & May 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.