The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1561•John Paul Turner v. Publisher, No. CA-02-503-7 W.D. Va. Mar. 14 & Apr. 11, 2002 . We deny the
02-1561Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 7, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1561
JOHN PAUL TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PUBLISHER, DAILY NEWS-RECORD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-503-7)
Submitted: July 3, 2002 Decided: August 7, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Paul Turner, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000) and
denying his motion for reconsideration and to amend. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Publisher, No.
CA-02-503-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14 & Apr. 11, 2002). We deny the
petition for writ of error coram nobis filed July 15, 2002, and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.