The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1524•Khosrow Moghadam v. Safeway, Incorporated
02-1524Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1524
KHOSROW MOGHADAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SAFEWAY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-185-A)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khosrow Moghadam, Appellant Pro Se. Margarita D. Santos, LITTLER
MENDELSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Khosrow Moghadam appeals the district court’s judgment
granting Safeway, Incorporated’s motion to dismiss and dismissing
the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Moghadam v. Safeway, Inc., No. CA-02-185-A (E.D. Va.
filed Apr. 16, 2002; entered Apr. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.