William R. White v. Dayco

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1515
WILLIAM R. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAYCO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.
(CA-01-3480-1-22)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William R. White, Appellant Pro Se. Catharine Garbee Griffin,
BAKER, RAVENEL & BENDER, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William R. White appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Dayco on the ground that White’s personal
injury action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See White v. Dayco, No. CA-01-3480-1-22 (D.S.C.
Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --