The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1511•Timothy A. Pledger v. THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, A Virginia Municipal Corporation
02-1511Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1511
TIMOTHY A. PLEDGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, A Virginia
Municipal Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-00-598-2)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy A. Pledger, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Scott Boynton,
Kimberly Rouse Essendelft, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Virginia Beach,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy A. Pledger appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Pledger v. City of Virginia, No. CA-00-598-2
(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2002). We deny Pledger leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.