The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1496•Brenda Smith v. Appleton Papers, Incorporated
02-1496Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1496
BRENDA SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
APPLETON PAPERS, INCORPORATED; MOORE
CORPORATION LIMITED, d/b/a Moore Business
Forms, Incorporated; THE MEAD CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-01-965-2)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Cowan Ervin Reid, Carlos LeMont
Hopkins, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia;
Lawrence Joseph Quinn, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland;
Laurence Brian Oppenheimer, HISCOCK, BARCLAY, SAPERSTON & DAY,
Buffalo, New York; Darlene Paige Bradberry, BREEDEN, SALB, BEASLEY
& DUVALL, Norfolk, Virginia; Joseph Dennis Rasnek, CARPENTER,
BENNETT & MORRISSEY, Newark, New Jersey, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Brenda Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Smith v. Appleton Papers, Inc., No. CA-01-965-
2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.