The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1415•Mark C. Love v. Joseph F. Murphy, Jr
02-1415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1415
MARK C. LOVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH F. MURPHY, JR.; DEBORAH S. EYLER; ARRIE
W. DAVIS; PETER B. KRAUSER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
02-682-CCB)
Submitted: August 9, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark C. Love, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark C. Love appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and subsequent
dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record, Love’s
brief, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Love v. Murphy, No. CA-02-682-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 8 & Apr.
1, 2002). We deny Love’s request for oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.