In re: Richard Hamlett

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1390
In Re: RICHARD HAMLETT,
Debtor.
RICHARD HAMLETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EVELYN K. KRIPPENDORF, Trustee,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-02-60-7, BK-98-2653-7-RKR, AP-00-146-7)
Submitted: September 30, 2002 Decided: October 10, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Evelyn K.
Krippendorf, THE KRIPPENDORF FIRM, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Hamlett appeals the district court’s order affirming
the bankruptcy court’s order denying Hamlett’s motion to reconsider
a prior order denying his request to file a late notice of appeal.
Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the opinions
below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Hamlett v. Krippendorf, No.
CA-02-60-7 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2002); No. BK-98-2653-7-RKR (Bankr.
W.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --