The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1383•Charles H. Roane v. Washington County Hospital
02-1383Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1383
CHARLES H. ROANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WASHINGTON COUNTY HOSPITAL; A. F. ABDULLAH,
Defendants - Appellees,
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-3191-CCB)
Submitted: August 30, 2002 Decided: September 20, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Cronin, CRONIN & SCARDINO, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania;
Kevin M. Fitzpatrick, LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN M. FITZPATRICK, P.C.,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael I. Joseph, ADELMAN,
SHEFF & SMITH, L.L.C., Rockville, Maryland; Conrad W. Varner,
VARNER & GOUNDRY, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles H. Roane appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reopen his medical malpractice action. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Roane v. Washington County Hosp., No. CA-98-
3191-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.