Sam Anthony v. the United States Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1382
SAM ANTHONY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED
STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-01-635-2)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sam Anthony, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Ball, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sam Anthony appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his civil action for failure to comply with the
court’s order to particularize his complaint in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Anthony’s
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Anthony v. United States Attorney General,
No. CA-01-635-2 (E.D. Va. March 6, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --