The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1374•Edward Moore v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
02-1374Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1374
EDWARD MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social
Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-01-8-3)
Submitted: August 13, 2002 Decided: August 29, 2002
Before WILKINS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce K. Billman, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. James
A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief
Counsel, Andrew C. Lynch, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the
General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Julie C.
Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Edward Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge to uphold the Commissioner’s
decision denying Moore’s application for a period of disability and
disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Moore v. Barnhart, No. CA-01-8-3 (W.D. Va.
Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.