The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1352•United States of America v. Patrick Edwin Rudd
02-1352Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1352
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PATRICK EDWIN RUDD,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
DEE IZBICKI; KATHRYN CREWS AVERETT, in her
official capacity as Granville County Register
of Deeds,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-730)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Patrick Edwin Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Edwin Rudd appeals the district court’s judgment
granting in part the Government’s motion for summary judgment. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Rudd’s motion to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Rudd, CA-01-730 (E.D.N.C. Feb.
4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.