The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1346•Elder Deforrorrora Locust v. James S. Perry
02-1346Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1346
ELDER DEFORRORRORA LOCUST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES S. PERRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-18-H)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 25, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elder Deforrorrora Locust, Appellant Pro Se. James Stockton Perry,
PERRY, PERRY & PERRY, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elder Deforrorrora Locust appeals in this civil case, arguing
that the district court improperly failed to grant his motion for
default. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.