The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1300•Thomas R. Shelton v. Richmond Public Schools
02-1300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1300
THOMAS R. SHELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-01-166-3)
Submitted: August 16, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas R. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas R. Shelton appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the magistrate judge. * See Shelton v. Richmond Public Schools,
No. CA-01-166-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.