The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1295•Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. Harry E. Walkup, Jr
02-1295Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1295
ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HARRY E. WALKUP, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-01-513)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry E. Walkup, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kermit J. Moore, BREWSTER,
MORHOUS & CAMERON, Bluefield, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harry E. Walkup, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Erie Insurance Property and Casualty
Company in its civil action against Walkup. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Erie Ins. Property & Cas. Co. v. Walkup, No. CA-01-513
(S.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.