The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1280•Arlene J. Hoffman v. JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C. Penney Company, Incorporated
02-1280Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1280
ARLENE J. HOFFMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C.
Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-01-1532-A)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arlene J. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Celeste deLorge Flippen, J.C.
PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plano, Texas; Claude David Convisser,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, No. CA-01-1532-A (E.D. Va.
filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.