The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1278•Luis Contreras v. Tesoro Corporation
02-1278Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1278
LUIS CONTRERAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TESORO CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-429-2)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Contreras, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Taylor Buckius, Christopher
Ambrosio, VANDEVENTER BLACK, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luis Contreras appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his civil action alleging employment discrimination and motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Contreras v. Tesoro Corp.,
No. CA-01-429-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2002; filed Feb. 11, 2002 &
entered Feb. 12, 2002). We deny Contreras’ motion to strike the
Appellee’s informal brief and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.