In re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1247
In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO,
Debtors.
MUZIO ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
JOSEPH NAPOLI; MARION NAPOLI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-3505-AW, BK-98-12440-PM)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muzio Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Louis
Heeney, LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS L. HEENEY, CHARTERED, Rockville,
Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Muzio Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district
court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order
dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court. Our review of
the record discloses no abuse of discretion and no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Roberto v. Napoli, Nos. CA-00-3505-AW; BK-98-12440-PM (D.
Md. Jan. 19, 2001 & Jan. 25, 2002). In light of this disposition,
we deny the Appellees’ motion for summary dismissal. We deny the
Robertos’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --