The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1244•Michael J. Sindram v. Columbia Union College
02-1244Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1244
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLUMBIA UNION COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge;
Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-2954-S)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 14, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri Elizabeth Cleary,
Peter M. Rosenberg, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order denying
leave to file his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s memorandum opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Sindram v. Columbia Union Coll., No. CA-01-2954-S (D. Md. Feb. 27,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.