The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1198•Lumie Soucek v. Lawson Mardon USA, Incorporated
02-1198Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1198
LUMIE SOUCEK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LAWSON MARDON USA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-01-423-V)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lumie Soucek, Appellant Pro Se. John Christopher Tillman, Associate
Counsel, ALCAN ALUMINUM CORPORATION, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lumie Soucek appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
wrongful termination, harassment, fraud and intentional infliction
of emotional distress claims raised on behalf of her husband. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Soucek v. Lawson Mardon USA, Inc., No. CA-01-423-V
(W.D.N.C. filed Feb. 8, 2002; entered Feb. 11, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.