The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1180•Francis Pierre v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General
02-1180Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 19, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1180
FRANCIS PIERRE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the
Attorney General; ARLINGTON COUNTY GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT, The Judges and the Clerk’s
Office; WASHINGTON SHUTTLE, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-71-A)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis Pierre, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Francis Pierre appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his attempt to appeal his state action. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Pierre v. Virginia, No. CA-02-71-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.