The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1171•Getachew Woldearegay v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service
02-1171Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1171
GETACHEW WOLDEAREGAY,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General for the United
States of America,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A70-817-716)
Submitted: June 5, 2002 Decided: June 24, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard S. Bromberg, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D.
McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters,
Assistant Director, Arthur L. Rabin, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Getachew Woldearegay seeks review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order dismissing his appeal from
the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and
withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the administrative
record and the Board’s decision and find that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s determination that Woldearegay failed to
establish a well-founded fear of persecution. Accordingly, we deny
Woldearegay’s petition for review on the reasoning of the Board.
See Woldearegay v. INS, No. A70-817-716 (B.I.A. Jan. 30, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.