The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1100•Myra Hamilton v. the Village of Cross Keys, Incorporated
02-1100Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1100
MYRA HAMILTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE VILLAGE OF CROSS KEYS, INCORPORATED; THE
ROUSE COMPANY; WALTER HOLLAWAY; MEL HANNAH;
SAHLIM MUSTAFA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-
3143-MJG)
Submitted: May 20, 2002 Decided: June 11, 2002
Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Myra Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Hafets, PIPER, MARBURY,
RUDNICK & WOLFE, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; Elisha A. King,
PIPER, MARBURY, RUDNICK & WOLFE, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Myra Hamilton appeals the district court’s order dismissing
this Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hamilton v.
Village of Cross Keys, Inc., No. CA-00-3143-MJG (D. Md. Dec. 19,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.