The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1063•Elder Lewis Banks v. Jefferson Smurfit Corporation
02-1063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1063
ELDER LEWIS BANKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-00-814-1)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elder Lewis Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elder Lewis Banks appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to his former employer on his employment
discrimination claims. Our review of the record and the district
court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Banks v. Jefferson
Smurfit Corp., No. CA-00-814-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2001). We also
deny Banks’ motion to review the record in No. CA-00-144-1. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.