The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1019•United States of America v. Fred A. Lotfian
02-1019Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FRED A. LOTFIAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-1835-PJM)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred A. Lotfian, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Tamera Lynn
Fine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Fred A. Lotfian appeals from the district court’s order
entering judgment in favor of the United States in its action to
recover amounts due on a promissory note executed in connection
with a student loan. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Lotfian, No. CA-00-1835-PJM (D. Md. filed Dec. 7, 2001 & entered
Dec. 10, 2001). We deny as moot the Government’s motion to require
Lotfian to serve his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.